0 comments 6.11.09

FLECKS OF INTERRUPTION

/// Sunday 15th November / The Odessa Club / 5pm / Doors: 7 euro (5 euro concession)

“Most thought-provoking in our thought-provoking time is that we are still not thinking”, said Martin Heidegger. Such statement opens the main notions and considerations that motivate the programme the Experimental Film Club presents at an unusual time this month. The reason for such an odd date comes from the inspiring source of this programme: the two-part international group exhibition “Automatic”, curated by Gavin Murphy and Chris Fite-Wassilak, currently on at Pallas Contemporary Project (Dublin). Gavin and Chris proposed to us to organize a film session that explored similar ideas to those that embedded the exhibition, which works, in their own words, attempt to “stretch out the persistent, ghostly sensory circuit between the artist, artwork and audience”. Perception was indeed one of the main subjects we discussed during the plotting of this programme, not so much as an experience which could be rationally comprehended, but as a vigorous, direct and impacting encounter with a percept, or a series of percepts, beyond immediate conscious understanding.

Theories of the mind such as the gestalt system, and a considerable part of Structural Film that explores the shape-forming capacity of the senses were important factors to take into account. Nevertheless, these factors couldn’t be separated, especially in experimental filmmaking, from the event of light itself. This is where flicker cinema comes into play, because its metrical montage and absence of images –subsequently, its absence of illusionist movement-, result in an exploration of intermittent light as the most essential cinematic mechanism. The way the brain reacts before such a phenomenon was intensely explored by mathematician, artist and composer Tony Conrad in his iconic avant-garde film The Flicker, which is part of this screening programme. The Flicker is a study of neuro-physiology in the form of a meticulous orchestration of black and clear leader, silence and white noise; rather than addressing the senses, the stroboscopic effects produced by The Flicker, trigger neurological operations that generate optic impressions of colours and shapes.

On the other hand, the title of the show, “Automatic”, immediately brought to my mind the works of William S. Burroughs and his collaborations with Brion Gysin and British filmmaker Antony Balch. Burroughs explored the subconscious operations of the mind in literature and film with automatic writing and the Cut-Up technique of composing texts and movement-images, but it was Antonin Artaud’s ideas around what he named “spiritual automaton” that seemed to come closer, conceptually speaking, to the subjacent approach of this programme. According to Artaud, what cinema advances is not the power of thought but, on the contrary, its “impower”. He believed cinema didn’t need a language because it is a matter of neuro-physiological vibrations: the image, therefore, must produce a shock, a nerve-wave in order to give rise to thought.

What Artaud’s understanding of cinema and automatic writing have in common is the materialization of a controlled gathering of critical and conscious thought with the unconscious in thought. Towers Open Fire (1963) is an excellent example of such process. The film is articulated as an experimental montage, an assault on linear narrative that features images of Gysin operating his flicker experiment, the Dream Machine, along with the voice of Burroughs reading excerpts from The Soft Machine. An important part of the film, running for around thirty seconds, is the first filmic illustration of the Cut-Ups method, culminating in a frenetic random, mathematically organized, series of images shot in Paris. Written by Burroughs and directed by Antony Balch, with contributions from Gysin and Ian Sommerville, Towers Open Fire is the first but not last collaboration between Balch/Burroughs, a true challenge to the audience.

The use of the flicker effect and the breakage of linear narratives by ways of repetition and circular entrapment are some of the features common to the works described above and Maximilian Le Cain’s, whose outstanding video pieces have been part of our programmes on a regular basis. One of the most fascinating aspects of the work of Cork-based artist and critic is its capacity to turn a given architectonical edifice into “thinking space”*, a process that is never presented exempt of a high degree of inexplicability or strangeness. Slavoj Zizek said the most disturbing moments in David Lynch’s films are those that seem to be trapped between fantasy and reality, not being entirely in one territory of the other, but in unknown’s land. Watching Point of Departure (2008) inspires a similar thought; the tension is built between two irreconcilable worlds or two parallel dimensions failing to syncretize. The protagonist, Betty (theater actress Anna Manahan who recently passed away), is trapped between the claustrophobic institution in which she spends the last years of her life and her desire to escape. An oneiric black and white, slow motion picture combined with the usual idiosyncrasy of Le Cain’s sound treatment, form the reality of Betty: a maze of corridors and closing doors.

As Betty goes to bed, it is perhaps time for us to wake up to the fact that extreme slowness, or even immobility, equals absolute speed. The zig-zag that glides between the explosive animated collages of Jeff Keen, the author of the ‘Artwar’ film series, gives substance to such energy. Although in a fragmented manner, assaulting the senses both visually and sonically, with his guerrilla filmmaking. The works of Brighton-based artist and pioneer of expanded cinema Jeff Keen amalgamate animation, live action and collage. They abound in references to popular culture such as toys and dolls, comic strips, Hollywood lines and photos, pre-war pulps, etc. In Artwar- The Last Frontier (1993), as in the rest of these works, art is under an “irresistible attack”, more plastic, materialist and malleable than ever, by “a prisoner of art”.

It has been said that Keen’s oeuvre is a fusion of the arts. This programme certainly is a synthesis of several art practices, including painting, music, literature, and sciences. While The Flicker offers a vocabulary of structure, physics, and mathematics, Point of Departure provides the most classic cinematographic aesthetics to the programme, especially considering its dramatic, silent film tone. And, there are, still, infinite common elements among the works discussed here. For instance, both the Dream Machine and The Flicker have been addressed as visual experiences that can produce hallucinations without chemicals, while some relationship could be traced between the intent of Burroughs to erase the word and Jeff Keen’s own Dada-like vocabulary ('blatz', 'blatzom', 'kinozap', 'omozap') and approach towards language: “kill the word, don’t let the word kill you!”.


*As it has been suggested with respect to Le Cain’s Making a Home, screened at the EFC as part of the programme T,O,U,C,H,I,N,G, The Architectures of Perception.


PROGRAMME TITLES
(TOTAL RUNNING TIME: 78 MINS APPROX.)


MAXIMILIAN LE CAIN’S “POINT OF DEPARTURE”
(2008, 8 mins, b&w, video, courtesy of the artist)

ANTONY BALCH / WILLIAM S. BURROUGHS' “TOWERS OPEN FIRE”
(1963, 16 mins, b&w, 16mm, distributed by LUX)

JEFF KEEN’S “ARTWAR: THE LAST FRONTIER”
(1993, 20 mins, colour, 8mm screened on dvd, distributed by BFI)

TONY CONRAD’S “THE FLICKER”
(1966, 30 mins, b&w, 16mm, distributed by LUX)


........
SUGGESTED LINKS:

The "Automatic" show, at Pallas Contemporary Art Project, is on until the 21st of November: P C P

About Point of Departure and Anna Manahan, see Close Watch.

William S. Burroughs community, Reality Studio.

Jeff Keen's website, Kinoblatz.

Interview with Tony Conrad about the inspiration behind The Flicker.
........
FLECKS OF INTERRUPTION is a film-programme curated by Esperanza Collado for the Experimental Film Club.

0 comments 24.10.09

M A U R I T A N I A
MOIRA TIERNEY & COLLABORATORS
‘MAISON DES CINEASTES’

/// Sunday 25th October / The Odessa Club / 5pm / Doors: 7 euro (5 euro concession)

'La Maison Des Cineastes', Mauritania, is an independent cultural establishment, created in 2003 by Mr. Abderrahmane Ahmed Salem and Abderrahmane Sissako. One of the aims of 'La Maison Des Cineastes' is to create a culture and industry of cinematography in Mauritania which incudes programmes on formation, production, diffusion and archiving. La Maison Des Cineastes works with 35 permanent operatives and 200 young volunteers.

Website: http://www.lamaisondescineastes.com




MOIRA TIERNEY'S "HABIBI"
(16mm 7 mins colour)

Filmed in New York in the summer of 2006: a march across the Brooklyn Bridge in support of the Lebanese population. Habibi means Beloved in Arabic.


MOUSSA SAMBA M'BOW'S "AMANDA"
(DV 6.5 mins colour)

The return from El dorado ...


DEMBA OUMAR KANE'S "LE COUMENE"
(DV 7 mins colour)

Was it the mythical Coumene, or just a lost child?



AHMED TALEK OULD TALEB LEHLAR'S "LA-BAS DANS LA CAPITALE"
(DV 3 mins colour)

From frying pan to fire: nomads' move to the city.


MARIAM MINT BEYROUK'S "LES CHERCHEUSES DE PIERRE"
(DV 25 mins colour)

Grassroots enterprise; or what happens when ladies hit the desert ...


MOIRA TIERNEY'S "HOPE'S VOICE"
(Super8 10 mins b&w)

A portrait of the Hope's Voice campaign members during a photo shoot in Brooklyn and Harlem in the summer of 2006: www.hopesvoice.org


TOTAL RUNNING TIME: 60 MINS

...

Moira Tierney's biography:

Born in 1969 in Dublin, Ireland. Lives and works in New York.
Working in set design at a film company in Ireland sparked Moira Tierney's interest in filmmaking. She received a Masters degree in Fine Arts from the École nationale d'arts in Cergy-Pontoise in 1997 and moved to New York on a Fullbright scholarship to Anthology Film Archives in 1999. One of her American Dreans series, American Dreams #3, was shot on 16 mm from the window and roof of her Brooklyn loft on September 11, using all of her film stock, a combination of black & white and color negatives, often a hallmark of her working methods.


MAURITANIA is a film-programme curated by Alan Lampert in collaboration with Moira Tierney for the Experimental Film Club and DEAF.

1 comments 22.6.09

S E L F - P O R T R A I T S
/// Sunday 28th June / The Odessa Club / 5pm / Doors: 7 euro (5 euro concession)

Experimental cinema is known for its rigorous investigation of the properties and possibilities of the film medium. But, given the intimate and homemade nature of most experimental filmmaking practices, it can also facilitate a rigorous investigation of the properties and possiblities of oneself. While none of the films in this programme are “self-portraits” in any conventional sense, all employ their authors’ own bodies as visual subjects, and explore human experiences of love, grief and loneliness that are extremely personal to their creators. This rootedness in personal experience can make them, in a way, more accessible than more purely formal experimental works. But it also presents a danger: that we will view these works primarily in terms of their autobiographical import rather than their powers as an aesthetic experience.

In seeking to address this, the films in this programme have been selected to cover a range of distinct formal approaches to self-reflection through cinema. Each offers a reinterpretation and expansion of what “portraying oneself” through cinema might be and might lead to. If the resonance and power of these films is strengthened by the impression of unflinching honesty and self-revelation that they share, it is ultimately the different ways in which they are stylistically organised that ensures their impact—rather than the (in some cases, quite ambiguous and tenuous) relation of the films to the specific facts of their authors’ lives.

Two classic experimental films were intended to open this programme—FUSES (1967, Carolee Schneemann, 22mins) and WINDOW WATER, BABY, MOVING (1959, Stan Brakhage, 13mins)—but unfortunately were not obtainable within our budget. (You can watch them online here and here.) Nonetheless, they’re worth mentioning because they represent an important approach to self-reflection through cinema. In Fuses, Schneemann documents her own lovemaking with her then partner James Tenney. These intimate and sensual scenes are fragmented and recombined through a mixture of collage and a material manipulation of the film footage. According to Schneemann, she “wanted to see if the experience of what I saw would have any correspondence to what I felt—the intimacy of the lovemaking... And I wanted to put into that materiality of film the energies of the body, so that the film itself dissolves and recombines and is transparent and dense—as one feels during lovemaking...” Window Water, Baby, Moving depicts the birth of Stan Brakhage’s first child, fragmenting the event into a series of sensual close-ups which build up rhythmically throughout the film. In both films the camera’s point of view is elusive, merging between the filmmaker, his/her lover and a third, inbetween perspective that seems to belong to the camera itself. The result is a form that powerfully captures the intersubjective expansion of self that occurs in romantic relationships.

SELF-IMPORTANT EMPIRICAL FILM #3, WITH VOICE-OVER (2005, Dave Andrae, 5mins)
is a contemporary work that bears some relation to the work of Brakhage and Schneemann in its carefully fragmented formal approach—but the key differences are Andrae’s use of narration and his related focus on the experience of isolation and loneliness as opposed to the intense connectedness and intersubjectivity of the earlier films. Andrae describes the film as “an honest attempt at examining the heavy fog of apprehension that pervaded my early twenties. In making the film I wanted to capture the listless abandon of young adult life—not just the obvious awkwardness and disillusionment, but also the occasional grace achieved during solitude.” If, in the earlier two films, the filmmakers’ self is defined and expressed in terms of what it is connected to (a lover, a family), in Self-Important… Andrae is left with nothing but himself with which to define his “self”. The filmmaking process—by allowing Andrae to film himself and his everyday world, and subsequently order and narrate these images—becomes a means of facilitating this internal process. In this case, the film’s formal innovation (in particular, it’s creative use of dissonance between the narration and imagery) develops from a very personal impulse—an attempt to elucidate and overcome his apathetic state of being.

The other three films in the programme highlight the ways in which film can be used not only to express but to actively develop and transform oneself. One of the key ways of doing this is by turning the camera on the filmmakers, subverting the traditionally voyeuristic relation filmmakers maintain with their subject. This puts the artist in the exposed position of performers, but with the added vulnerability of being seen as the author of their own image.

Perhaps the most complex film from this point of view is five more minutes (2005, Dena DeCola and Karin E Wandner, 17mins), at once the most constructed and the most disarmingly direct work in this programme. DeCola and Wandner star in the film, acting out a roleplay between a mother and her young daughter. What at first seems like almost camp make-believe builds to a harrowingly emotional catharsis as it becomes clear that these women are not just play-acting for fun. Described by its makers as “an exploration of grief”, the film’s raw camerawork and occasional self-reflexive ruptures (the women sometimes fall out of character, the camera is not always ignored) emphasises the artificiality of this role-play while simultaneously suggesting the veracity of the context surrounding it. However, it’s worth noting that the artists’ own synopsis of the film describes its characters in the third person: “Two women spend an afternoon recreating lost time”, suggesting that whether these “two women” are carefully written constructs or the authors’ own exposed selves is perhaps besides the point. Either way, the film serves as a vivid articulation of the ways in which theatricality can be used as both a means of protection and a pathway to deeper revelation.

STAGES OF MOURNING (2003, Sarah Pucill, 17mins) also deals with grief, but in a more restrained and formal way, exploiting cinema’s power as a means of remembering and reflecting more than as a space for performance. Pucill confronts the mediums in which her late lover and collaborator, Sandra Lahire, still exists: photography, film and video that were produced in their six years of collaboration. The delicate series of title cards that open the film makes clear its personal thrust: addressing Lahire, Pucill writes, “I put you together / to put myself together”. Like the earlier films, there is a complex mix of formal intricacy and self-exposure: the intangible past represented in the photos, films and videos of Lahire are connected to Pucill’s present-tense body and domestic space in a way that is both inventive and emotionally revealing. While Brakhage and Schneemann’s films are both collaborations between lovers, and depict an expanded and interconnected sense of self as a result, Stages of Mourning is a working-through of the aftermath of such a collaboration; an attempt to recuperate oneself after part of it has passed away. These “stages of mourning” are not illustrated through the film, but are actually enacted through the filmmaking process.

Considering that his filmography mainly consists of narrative feature films, defining Caveh Zahedi as an experimental filmmaker may be a controversial move, but he is certainly one of the most prominent examples of self-portraiture through cinema, and the one filmmaker in this programme who describes himself as an autobiographical filmmaker. This has taken the form of re-enactments (his first feature, A Little Stiff), experiments in filmmaking without control (I Don’t Hate Las Vegas Anymore, which he described as “directed by God”), video diaries (In the Bathroom of the World) and mixtures of all of the above (his most recent film, I am a Sex Addict).

One of the few experimental figures who has documented his own everyday life as persistently as Zahedi is Jonas Mekas—but the key difference is that Mekas’ camera is expressive and visionary, concerned with capturing the way he sees the world and the poetry of the everyday. Zahedi’s camera is more prosaic formally, partly because it’s usually not held by Zahedi himself, but pivotally because it’s treated more as a means of studying and provoking situations than as his primary means of self-expression. In THE WORLD IS A CLASSROOM (2002, Caveh Zahedi, 14mins), a documentary film class Zahedi was teaching in September 2001 is overtaken by a feud between Zahedi and a student in his class who objects to his methods and, in particular, doesn’t want to be featured in the film Zahedi is making about his class. Just as Pucill’s “stages of mourning” are not illustrated through film but are actually acted out through the filmmaking process, Zahedi’s filmmaking becomes the catalyst for its own drama: it’s by exposing himself and his students to the camera that he pushes them all into more expressive and revealing “performances”.

For Zahedi, filmmaking “is about process as much as the final product. I'm always trying to make films that, in the making of the film itself, somehow improve my life or relationships. In that sense, I'm always putting myself on the line. I'm not interested in a prefab kind of experience. It's always about testing and challenging and growing and seeing where something will take one.” But this is a process that these filmmakers also offer to the viewers in the experience of watching their films—all of which are very much embodiments of a process, a journey for each viewer that cannot be summarised. It’s significant that critic Ray Carney described five more minutes as “an attempt to open us up.” Indeed, perhaps “self-portraits” is less appropriate a term than self-expansions, since all of these films hint at the (ultimately desirable) uncontainability of the self. Critic Fred Camper argued that to call Brakhage’s work personal could be used to imply a certain limitation, when in fact “one characteristic of the arc of his career is a continual broadening of his own notion of the ‘self.’ ” And Sarah Pucill’s work has been described in terms that can apply, in different ways, to all of the films in this programme: an exploration of “the mirroring and merging we seek in the Other; a sense of self which is transformative and fluid” and “the idea that as subjects we are not separate.”


(First photo above taken by Star Barry. For more information on Dave Andrae, click here. For more information on five more minutes, click here. For more information on Sarah Pucill, and to purchase some of her films, click here. For more information on Caveh Zahedi, and to purchase some of his films, click here.)

SELF-PORTRAITS is a film-programme curated by Donal Foreman for the Experimental Film Club.

3 comments 31.5.09


CITY SYMPHONIES PART 2

/ Sunday 31st May / Odessa Club (upstairs) / 5pm / Doors: 7 Euro /

Berlin/ Symphony of a City
Walther Ruttmann 1928 B&W silent 65'

Ca Sera Beau (From Beyrouth With love)
Wael Noureddine 2005 colour sound 30'


'City Symphonies'. Ruttmann’s silent film 'Berlin/Symphony of a City' made in 1928 will be accompanied a reading of extracts from Seigfried Kracauer's 'The Mass Ornament'. There is an interesting relationship between the film and Kracauer's text. Ruttmann's 'Berlin/Symphony of a City' shows empty Berlin streets and works as a melancholy meditation of a city revealed through it's architecture and light rather than the activities of it's inhabitants. Kracauer was critical of this lack of human life in the film. In 'The Mass Ornament' Kracauer discusses the seduction and power of large spectacles and display. There is a tension created between the juxtaposition of the film and the text. Wael Noureddine's film 'Ca Sera Beau (From Beyrouth with Love)' madein 2005 is a tender portrait of a war torn city. Amongst ruins, the camera moves through the streets and into peoples apartments giving an intimate glimpse  of his friends lives. With a vibrant soundtrack 'Ca Sera Beau' works as a temporal film collage revealing the little seen effects of war. Ruttman's 'Berlin/Symphony of a City' made in 1928 between the two world wars also captures a city at a pivotal moment in
history. 


Film-programme by Aoife Desmond

3 comments 23.4.09


THE WIZARD OF OZ ... AND OTHER DREAMS / THE GOLD STANDARD

/ Sunday 29th April / Ha'penny Bridge Inn (upstairs) / 4pm / Doors: 5 Euro /

Joseph Cornell's "Thimble Theatre", "Jack's Dream" and "The Children's Party" circa 1930 - 1970, with "The Wizard of Oz - a la 'Rose Hobart' circa 1925 - 2009.

" ... the old-time fairy tale, having served for generations, may now be classed as "historical" in the children's library; for the time has come for a series of newer "wonder tales" in which the stereo-typed genie, dwarf and fairy are eliminated, together with all the horrible and blood-curdling incident devised by their authors to point a fearsome moral to each tale. Modern education includes morality; therefore the modern child seeks only entertainment in its wonder-tales and gladly dispenses with all disagreeable incident."

This statement was made by the author of 'The Wizard of Oz', L. Frank Baum, in Chicago, in this month, April, of 109 years ago. To put it in context, Baum had just been editor of a silverite newspaper in South Dakota, from where he had been watching the intense American elections of 1896 and 1900. The Democrats intended to make silver money at the ratio of 16 ounces of silver to 1 ounce of gold, arguing that there was lots of silver out West, but the world's small stock of gold was controlled by wicked bankers in New York and London. The Republicans ran against this plan, but Baum supported the Democrats. With the abbreviation of 'Ounce' to 'Oz', in the financial lexicon of the day, the term 'Oz' must have abounded in the editor's articles. From his political perspective the wicked witches were in the East and West, the good witch was in the North ( an electoral mandate ), and the utopian 'Oz' was in the very centre of the country. After vanquishing the Wicked Witch of the East ( the Eastern bankers ) Baum's protagonist 'Dorothy' ( every woman ) frees The Munchkins ( the little people ) and with the witch's silver slippers ( the silver standard ), she sets out on the Yellow Brick Road ( the gold standard ) to the Emerald City ( Washington ), where they meet the Wizard ( the President ).

In attempting to write a modern children's story without moral undertones, if this was indeed his intention, it appears that the author, in this instance, may have completely failed. The Wizard of Oz, however, is not material to be taken lightly, as silent screen star, actor and director, Larry Semon discovered 20 years later. Semon had Baum's son working on adapting his father's material for the script of the 1925 silent version, but that didn't cut him the slack he expected and his career took a hit from the serious backlash against its differences from the original novel. He reconfigured it as a slapstick comedy with elements of political intrigue, but none that hark back to the election's witnessed by his screenwriter's father or the issues of the gold standard. The film uses a strange framing device, a man reading his daughter the novel ( even she's bored with the political mumbo-jumbo ). This device isn't so strange by modern standards, but the film has no yellow brick road, no witches, no toto, no munchkins, no emerald city and no recognizable version of the Wizard. In attempting to adapt a modern children's story without moral undertones as a movie of political intrigue, if this was indeed his intention, it appears that the author's son, in this instance, may have completely failed.



In the year of the release of Larry Semon's mis-directed revisioning of The Wizard of Oz, Joseph Cornell was converting to Christian Science after a 'healing experience' in New York. Surrealism was beginning to be felt in America and in November 1931 Cornell discovered Julien Levy’s newly opened gallery. He showed Levy some of his collages. They closely resembled the collages of Max Ernst. Through Levy, Cornell became acquainted with a wide range of Surrealist art as well as with various artists in New York, including Marcel Duchamp. In January 1932 he was included in the Surrealism exhibition at the Julien Levy Gallery, the first survey of Surrealism in New York, to which he contributed a number of collages and an object. By the time of his first one-man show at the same gallery in November 1932 he had started producing his famous "shadow boxes". These were small circular or rectangular found boxes containing mounted or unmounted engravings and objects. At the same show, which was concurrent with an exhibition of engravings by Picasso, Cornell displayed 'Jouets surréalistes' and 'Glass Bells'. The former were small mechanical and other toys altered by the addition of collage, this use of toys suggesting the relationship between art and play.

This relationship between art and play is essential in Cornell's work, and the re-contextualizing of images and themes from fairy tales and children's stories is a running theme. His work also drew upon the basic Surrealist principle of the juxtaposition of unlikelies—“as beautiful as the chance meeting on a dissecting table of a sewing machine and an umbrella,” as Lautréamont put it. In the early 1930's Cornell started making films from off cuts of Hollywood B-movies and showreels. The source material footage for his shorter montages revolve around a fascinating mélange of: a children’s party; circus performers and animal acts; science documentaries, etc. Cornell cuts freely and intuitively from one to the other. A second look reveals all manner of visual rhyming—e.g. a circus strong-man lifts a chair with his teeth/kids apple-dunk at a party; or children fling confetti about/a chorus girl plays flamboyantly with feathers. An image of a twirling ballet dancer, overexposed against a pitch-black background, becomes an abstract pattern of fluid shapes, as if it were quicksilver darting about on a Petri dish.




At one point in "The Children's Party Trilogy", there is, curiously, footage of a little girl on a horse who is playing Godiva in a pageant and appears to be unclothed under her thick long tresses. It’s an innocent image that is also a tad unsettling. This is generally true of Cornell—there is great innocence and yearning and delicacy in his images, but they contain little spiky dissonances without ever shading into either carnal or outright disturbing.

P. Adams Sitney notes:

" In a way, Cornell’s wit is like that of Hans Christian Andersen, who can tell a story about an Emperor who exposes himself to a whole city, and especially to a little girl, without the readers noticing what is happening in the story. Successive generations of parents have proven the moral of “The Emperor’s New Clothes” by seeing only the moral and blinding themselves to the exhibitionism. The children to whom they read it tend to titter; they understand what it is about."



Cornell’s best-known film is "Rose Hobart", a re-editing of an obscure B-movie jungle drama called East Of Borneo (1931) starring the equally obscure actress who gives the film its title. He stripped it of sound and eliminated all the strong plot points—a journey upriver through the jungle, a volcanic explosion—and instead edited together, blithely ignoring linearity and continuity and following only his poetic instinct, a collection of reaction shots, gestures and expressions. Sitney writes:

"Cornell’s montage is startlingly original. Nothing like it occurs in the history of the cinema until thirty years later. The deliberate mismatching of shots, the reduction of conversations to images of the actress without corresponding shots of her interlocutor, and the sudden shifts of location were so daring in 1936 that even the most sophisticated viewers would have seen the film as inept rather than brilliant. […] [He] used some shots just as they were fading out or just as a door was closing, omitting the main action. By wrenching the images out of their narrative function, he suddenly freed them, making them instruments of suggestion".

The manifesto of the author of one of the most lasting and potent children's stories, 'The Wizard of Oz', to the effect that " ... the old-time fairy tale, having served for generations, may now be classed as "historical" in the children's library; for the time has come for a series of newer "wonder tales" in which the stereo-typed genie, dwarf and fairy are eliminated" may have been more prophetic if it had been made by a pre-Surrealist Dada in relation to the emancipation from meaning achieved in Cornell's found footage films ...

This month, The Experimental Film Club presents Larry Semon's mis-directed 1925 adaptation of 'The Wizard of Oz', re-edited in the flavour of Joseph Cornell's 'Rose Hobart' and accompanied by a selection of Cornell's found film montages applying Surrealist principles to images from Children's culture - parties, circuses and fairy tales, made sporadically between 1930 and 1970 and left to a friend to finish. As L. Frank Baum's son attempts to re-contextualise his father's attempt at a 'modern' fairy tale, and as Cornell juxtaposes a puppet asleep by a fire in the cottage of Little Red Riding Hood with a slowly sinking pirate galleon, to be finished and scored by a friend, so friends and relations and subsequent generations are left to re-interpret and re-contextualise the works of artists, commercial and experimental. Perhaps Lautréamont's 'juxtaposition of unlikelies" can act as a kind of mesh through which a real emancipation of "the old time fairy tale", as Baum puts it, can truly occur. With such a powerful conversion device a far better ratio than 16 ounces of silver to 1 ounce of gold can be achieved by the 'gold standard', or 'Oz' of the art of assemblage.



Film-programme by Alan Lambert.

3 comments 6.4.09

C I T Y S Y M P H O N I E S

/ Sunday 29th March / Ha'penny Bridge Inn (upstairs) / 4pm / Doors: 5 Euro /


JEAN VIGO'S "À PROPOS DE NICE" (1930)

"In this film, by showing certain basic aspects of a city, a way of life is put on trial... the last gasps of a society so lost in its escapism that it sickens you and makes you sympathetic to a revolutionary solution." Jean Vigo described the film in an address to the Groupement des Spectateurs d'Avant-Garde. ‘À Propos de Nice’ is a 1930 silent short film directed by Jean Vigo and photographed by Boris Kaufman. The film depicts life in Nice, France by documenting the people in the city, their daily routines, a carnival and social inequalities. A propos de Nice constructs around the central motif of the carnival a savage, frenetic vision of a superficial society in a state of putrefaction. As bold in its formal experimentation as it is in its gleefully morbid fascination with ugliness, the grotesque humour of its portraits of the holidaymakers that swarm over the Promenade des Anglais (sometimes suggestively intercut with shots of animals!) is brutally undercut by images of distressing poverty. The uneasy atmosphere of indolence and boredom boiling over into lustful frenzy while willfully ignoring the encroaching sense of death and decay that surround it makes this Vigo's darkest film. A propos de Nice limits itself to the death dance of caricatures, caricatures all the more startling for being stolen from life with a hidden camera. What is already present in A propos de Nice is Vigo's ability to capture the natural beauty of a real, non-studio setting and spontaneously elaborate on the impression, transforming the commonplace into the magical. His eye for atmosphere and detail would grow from film to film, but from the outset it was rooted in a documentary practice that simultaneously transcended the documentary."

(Le Cain, Maximilian. http://www.sensesofcinema.com/contents/directors/02/vigo.html, Senses of Cinema http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/directors/02/vigo.html)


DZIGA VERTOV'S "THE MAN WITH THE MOVIE CAMERA" (1929)
Live music by Benedict Schlepper-Connolly (Dublin)

"I am an eye. I am a mechanical eye. I, a machine, I am showing you a world, the likes of which only I can see" Dziga Vertov

"I was returning from the railroad station. In my ears, there remained chugs and bursts of steam from a departing train. Somebody cries in laughter, a whistle, the station bell, the clanking locomotive...whispers, shouts, farewells. And walking away I thought I need to find a machine not only to describe but to register, to photograph these sounds. Otherwise, one cannot organize or assemble them. They fly like time. Perhaps a camera? That records the visual. But to organize the visual world and not the audible world? Is this the answer?"- Dziga Vertov

‘The man with Movie Camera’ is a silent feature length film directed by Dziga Vertov and photographed by his brother Mikail Kaufmann. It is shot in more than one city and depicts Soveit urban life in general. Vertov says in his essay "The Man with a Movie Camera" that he was fighting "for a decisive cleaning up of film-language, for its complete separation from the language of theater and literature. For Vertov, "life as it is" means to record life as it would be without the camera present. "Life caught unawares" means to record life when surprised, and perhaps provoked, by the presence of a camera This explanation contradicts the common assumption that for Vertov "life caught unawares" meant "life caught unaware of the camera."

"We all felt...that through documentary film we could develop a new kind of art. Not only documentary art, or the art of chronicle, but rather an art based on images, the creation of an image-oriented journalism" Mikhail Kaufmann.

‘Man with a Movie Camera’ is at once a documentary, a newsreel and an experimental film. It reveals Vertov’s deep criticism of a cinema and documentary tradition tied to narrative and literary structure. He deconstructs the image by using different camera techniques slow motion, fast motion freeze frame etc. In the use of these more abstract and cinematic techniques he reveals an everyday experience. Often using hidden cameras he seeks a new cinematic truth. The images become linked by chance, rhythm and visual connections.



Film-programme by Aoife Desmond.

2 comments 14.2.09

V E N O M, E T E R N I T Y & O T H E R D I S C R E P A N C I E S

/ Sunday 22nd February / Ha'penny Bridge Inn (upstairs) / 4pm / Doors: 5 Euro /

Calm down, you assholes, shut up!
First of all, I think the cinema is too rich. It’s obese. It’s reached its limits, its maximum capacity.
A mere blockage will shatter this fat-filled pig into a thousand pieces.
I hereby announce the destruction of cinema, the first apocalyptic sign of disjunction, the rupture of this ballooning, and pot-bellied organism known as film.

(Excerpt from Venom and Eternity, Isidore Isou)

This month’s film programme pays homage to Discrepant Cinema, the bold manifesto by one of the most radical filmmakers in film’s history: Jean-Isidore Isou. According to Isou, one must divide to conquer. This applies to the two wings of cinema: sound (speech) and image, which he wanted by all means to sever: “I want to separate the ear from its movie master: the eye.” Isou advocated for a cinema in which the images, in their photographic and representative obsolescence, must rot, giving way to the breakage of the spontaneous association that made speech the correspondent of vision. “Who ever said that cinema, whose meaning is motion, has to be the motion of images and not the motion of words?” Isou proclaimed.

Isou (Rumania, 1925), founded Lettrism or Letterism in the late 1940s in France, an avant-gardist movement that covered a galaxy of practices (writing, performing and plastic arts, music, etc.), and has been associated, for its multidisciplinar vocation and antiartistic ideation to Dada, Futurism and Fluxus. We are showing Traité de Bave et d’Éternité or Venom and Eternity (1951), the first film Isou made, which constitutes the manifesto of Lettrist cinema. The film was made from footage found in labs rubbish combined with original 16mm film footage, and was presented that same year in Cannes Festival, receiving the Prix des Espectateurs d’Avant-garde award from a jury formed by Jean Cocteau among others.

Isou saw debate as the superseding of cinema: “since cinema is dead, we shall turn debate into a master piece”. Venom and Eternity begins with a five-minute sound poem over black leader. What follows is Isou’s visionary contra-cinema speech, a revolution against the decadent and dilapidated conventions of the medium. Isou wants to transpose the art of debate and sound, in its various forms, directly into cinema and in detriment to the photographic image.

It isn’t surprising that American filmmaker Stan Brakhage admired and wrote about Isou’s work. Brakhage’s films are a latent manifesto against visual representation: “I now no longer photograph, but rather paint upon clear strips of film – essentially freeing myself from the dilemmas of re-presentation. I aspire to a visual music, a music for the eyes (as my films are entirely without sound-tracks these days). Just as a composer can be said to work primarily with «musical ideas», I can be said to work with the ideas intrinsic to film, which is the only medium capable of making paradigmatic «closure» apropos Primal Sight.”

The film we are showing on this programme by Brakhage, The Dante’s Quartet (1987, 16mm, 7mins) has been especially recommended by Pip Chodorov (founder of distribution company Re:Voir in Paris, which has recently restored Isou’s film). The Dante’s Quartet is the result of Brakhage's long-standing fascination with The Divine Comedy, “a brief but spectacular filmic attempt to find a visual equivalent or rhyme for the four stages of the ascent from hell depicted by Dante”(1). Brakhage’s late films embody a sort of abstract expressionism in motion informed by his interest in hypnagogic or closed-eye vision, which he described as “what you see through your eyes closed - at first a field of grainy, shifting, multi-colored sands that gradually assume various shapes. It's optic feedback: the nervous system projects what you have previously experienced - your visual memories - into the optic nerve endings. Moving visual thinking, on the other hand, occurs deeper in the synapsing of the brain. It's a streaming of shapes that are not nameable - a vast visual 'song of the cells expressing their internal life.”(2)

The absence of images, the black screen in the first minutes of Isou’s Traité de Bave et d’Éternité (or in Howls for Sade, a film containing no images whatsoever Isou ideated with Guy Debord and was later realized by the author of The Society of Spectacle in 1952), in many of Brakhage’s films (Dog Star Man, for instance, or Reflection on Black), and in Aldo Tambellini’s Black Films (Black Is [1965], Black Trip 1 [1965], Black Trip 2 [1967], Blackout [1965]), is of a special significance. The absence of images, the black screen expresses disbelief for the association of images – while all associations are possible – it is a space dedicated to imagination.

Aldo Tambellini’s Black Films (1965-7) are non-photographic too. In these films, Tambellini used clear leader, which he used as a scroll, turning a blind eye to the frames, a mixture of chemicals, paint, ink and stencils (sometimes using found objects, such as computer cards) as well as slicing and scraping the celluloid directly. The Black Films are concerned, as John Cage’s conception of silence, Ad Reinhardt’s black paintings, or Takahiko Iimura’s films Ma:Intervals (1977), with notions of time as a colourless intersection, void and nothingness. (Henri Bergson: “I cannot get rid of the idea that the full is an embroidery on the canvas of the void, that being is superimposed on nothing, and that in the idea of «nothing» there is less than that of «something». Hence all the mystery.” [Creative Evolution, 1944]).

As the title of Isou’s film, this programme is drawn according to three axis: the propagandist solemnity (traité) of Venom and Eternity, the negation of a contemptible past of photographic cinema, or a cinema of sound/image associations (bave), and the ambition of reaching the excellence of celestial space (Éternité). Aldo Tambellini’s Statement on BLACK expresses the latter:



suspended
over the void
the immense
black space

the silence of
the universe
the infinite sky

how intensely BLACK
how deeper than BLACK
how blacker than BLACK
can space be
when the sun
is blackout
&
throughout
the universe
BLACK IS

the blind see
a transplanted prophetic vision
projecting darkening images
over the sun

the sun burns the eyes
of those who can see
& have no vision

somehow
the solar winds navigate the BIG THOUGHT throughout black space infinity
somehow
a message breathes from the universe consciousness
somehow
there is a language to be decoded
somehow
there is still silence in its echo
somehow
we are in a mindless voyage to destruction


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Adrian Danks, Across the Universe: Stan Brakhage's The Dante Quartet, in Senses of Cinema, 2004.
http://archive.sensesofcinema.com/contents/cteq/04/32/dante_quartet.html
(2) Stan Brakhage quoted in Suranjan Ganguly, “Stan Brakhage – The 60th Birthday Interview”, Film Culture no. 78, summer 1994, p. 26.


Film-programme by Esperanza Collado with Donal Foreman.